4.6 Article

Template-free ultraspray pyrolysis synthesis of N/Fe-doped carbon microspheres for oxygen reduction electrocatalysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 3, 期 37, 页码 18920-18927

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ta02570b

关键词

-

资金

  1. MIUR (Italy) under the Project NAMED-PEM (PRIN)
  2. Science Foundation Ireland [13/CDA/2213, 12/IP/1273]
  3. IAESTE Programme
  4. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [13/CDA/2213, 12/IP/1273] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrasonic spray pyrolysis was used in a continuous flow apparatus for the template-free synthesis of iron- and nitrogen-doped porous carbon materials. Solutions of glucose, histidine and Fe(CH3COO)(2) were nebulized and pyrolyzed yielding carbon microspheres. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) and Focused Ion Beam (FIB) milling revealed that microspheres initially possess empty cores and a smooth shell. Further annealing leads to a collapse of this shell, and formation of porous microspheres with high roughness and iron-rich aggregates. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) were used to investigate bulk and surface chemistry: microspheres were found to undergo graphitization; Fe and Fe3C particles form and become encapsulated within the carbon phase, while the nitrogen present in the precursor solution results in the formation of pyridinic/ pyrrolic N-centers. The microspheres were tested as electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in acidic solution. Polarization curves using a Rotating Disk Electrode (RDE) yielded electrocatalytic behavior, and the number of exchanged electrons n = 3.7 +/- 0.2 calculated from Koutecky-Levich plots suggests that direct formation of H2O is the preferred ORR mechanism. These results indicate that this synthetic approach offers a simple and scalable strategy for the preparation of electrode materials for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据