4.6 Article

Dual-template synthesis of ordered mesoporous carbon/Fe2O3 nanowires: high porosity and structural stability for supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 3, 期 43, 页码 21501-21510

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ta06372h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Nanostructures for Electrical Energy Storage (NEES), an Energy Frontier Research Centre - US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DESC0001160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon/metal oxide composites are considered promising materials for high energy density supercapacitors. So far, impregnation of the oxide into ordered mesoporous carbon materials has been demonstrated either in hard-templated carbon synthesized by using ordered mesoporous silica or alumina scaffolds, or soft-templated carbon derived from surfactant micelles. The hard-template method can provide a high pore volume but the instability of these mesostructures hinders total electrode performances upon oxide impregnation. While the soft-template methods can provide a stable mesostructure, these methods produce scaffolds with a much smaller pore volume and surface area, leading to limited metal oxide loading and electrode capacitance. Herein, anodized aluminum oxide (AAO) and triblock copolymer F127 are used together as hard and soft-templates to fabricate ordered mesoporous carbon nanowires (OMCNWs) as a host material for Fe2O3 nanoparticles. This dual-template strategy provides a high pore volume and surface area OMCNW that retains its stable structure even for high metal oxide loading amounts. Additionally, the unique nanowire morphology and mesoporous structure of the OMCNW/Fe2O3 facilitate high ionic mobility in the composite, leading to >260 F g(-1) specific capacitance with good rate capability and cycling stability. This work highlights the dual-template approach as a promising strategy for the fabrication of next generation heterogeneous composites for electrochemical energy storage and conversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据