4.6 Article

Three-dimensional Au0.5/reduced graphene oxide/Au0.5/reduced graphene oxide/carbon fiber electrode and its high catalytic performance toward ethanol electrooxidation in alkaline media

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 3, 期 8, 页码 4389-4398

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ta05193a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51373111, 51073114, 20933007]
  2. Project of Scientific and Technologic Infrastructure of Suzhou [SZS201207]
  3. Suzhou Nano-project [ZXG2012022]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  5. Soochow University
  6. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Electronic Information Materials and Devices [XJYS0901-2010-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A three-dimensional Au nanoparticle/reduced graphene oxide (RGO)/carbon fiber (CF) hybrid electrode (denoted as Au-0.5/RGO/Au-0.5/RGO/CF) was fabricated via a layer-by-layer method. The as-formed composite was characterized by Raman spectrometry, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectrometry. Two RGO sheets and two Au nanoparticle sheets were assembled in alternate layers on the CFs. The catalytic performance of the as-prepared electrode was evaluated via cyclic voltammetry and chronopotentiometry. The as-synthesized three-dimensional Au-0.5/RGO/Au-0.5/RGO/CF electrode showed highly efficient electrocatalytic activity toward ethanol oxidation in alkaline medium and the Au nanoparticles were not affected by the graphene layers. The synergistic interaction between the RGO sheets and Au nanoparticles enhanced the catalytic activity of the electrode. The excellent electronic conductivity of the RGO sheets benefited electron transfer and the removal of the intermediate species by oxidation during the ethanol electrooxidation reaction, which improved the catalytic activity. As a result of the effects of these multiple factors, the Au-0.5/RGO/Au-0.5/RGO/CF electrode displayed a good catalytic performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据