4.6 Article

High photocurrent generation by photosystem I on artificial interfaces composed of π-system-modified graphene

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 3, 期 23, 页码 12188-12196

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5ta00656b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bundes-ministerium fur Bildung und Forschung BMBF, Germany (Biotechnologie 2020+) [031A154A+B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PhotosystemI (PSI) is a key component of the oxygenic photosynthetic electron transport chain because of its light-induced charge separation and electron transfer (ET) capabilities. We report the fabrication of an efficient graphene-biohybrid light-harvesting electrode consisting of cyanobacterial trimeric PSI complexes immobilized onto pi-system-modified graphene electrodes. Based on the strong interaction between conjugated aromatic compounds and the graphene material via pi-pi-stacking, we have designed a simple but smart platform to fabricate light-driven photoelectrochemical devices. Due to the possibility of surface property adaptation and the excellent conductivity of graphene, the modified biohybrid electrodes exhibit a well-defined photoelectrochemical response. In particular, the PSI-graphene electrode applying pyrene butyric acid NHS ester displays a very high photocurrent output of 23 mu A cm(-2) already at the open circuit potential which can be further increased by an overpotential and the use of an electron acceptor (methyl viologen) under air saturation up to 135 mu A cm(-2). Comparing the graphene-PSI biohybrid systems based on different pi-system-modifiers reveals that the pyrene derivatives result in higher current outputs compared to the anthracene derivatives and that the covalent fixation during immobilization appears more efficient compared to simple adsorption. Interestingly, the pyrene-based PSI electrodes also display a nearly unidirectional photocurrent generation, establishing the feasibility of conjoining these nanomaterials as potential constructs in next-generation photovoltaic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据