4.3 Article

Review of the systematics, distribution, biogeography and natural history of Moroccan amphibians

期刊

ZOOTAXA
卷 3661, 期 1, 页码 1-+

出版社

MAGNOLIA PRESS
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3661.1.1

关键词

North Africa; Maghreb; Amphibia; Anura; Urodela; tadpole; identification key

类别

资金

  1. Portuguese Integrated Program of ICDT [1/SAESCTN/ALENT-07-0224-FEDER-001755]
  2. DAPTF seed-grant
  3. FI-DGR grant from the Generalitat de Catalunya, Spain [2013FI_B1 00110]
  4. Societas Europaea Herpetologica
  5. JAE program (CSIC, Spain)
  6. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia, Spain [CGL2009-11663/BOS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The amphibian fauna of the Kingdom of Morocco was traditionally regarded as poor and closely related to its European counterpart. However, an increase in research during the last decades revealed a considerable degree of endemism amongst Moroccan amphibians, as well as phenotypic and genotypic inter-and intraspecific divergence. Despite this increase in knowledge, a comprehensible overview is lacking while several systematic issues have remained unresolved. We herein present a contemporary overview of the distribution, taxonomy and biogeography of Moroccan amphibians. Fourteen fieldtrips were made by the authors and colleagues between 2000 and 2012, which produced a total of 292 new distribution records. Furthermore, based on the results of the present work, we (i) review the systematics of the genus Salamandra in Morocco, including the description of a new subspecies from the Rif- and Middle Atlas Mountains, Salamandra algira splendens ssp. nov.; (ii) present data on intraspecific morphological variability of Pelobates varaldii and Pleurodeles waltl in Morocco; (iii) attempt to resolve the phylogenetic position of Bufo brongersmai and erect a new genus for this species, Barbarophryne gen. nov.; (iv) summarize and assess the availability of tadpole-specific characteristics and bioacoustical data, and (v) summarize natural history data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据