4.5 Article

Domestic Cats Constitute a Natural Reservoir of Human Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Types

期刊

ZOONOSES AND PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 56, 期 5, 页码 229-237

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01190.x

关键词

EPEC; AAEC; cats; humans; MLST; Brazil

资金

  1. Eliana Claudia Perroud Morato received a fellowship from the 'Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)' from Brazil
  2. FAPESP (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil)
  3. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico, DF, Brazil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Feces of 70 diarrhoeic and 230 non-diarrhoeic domestic cats from Sao Paulo, Brazil were investigated for enteropathogenic (EPEC), enterohaemorrhagic (EHEC) and enterotoxigenic (ETEC) Escherichia coli types. While ETEC and EHEC strains were not found, 15 EPEC strains were isolated from 14 cats, of which 13 were non-diarrhoeic, and one diarrhoeic. None of 15 EPEC strains carried the bfpA gene or the EPEC adherence factor plasmid, indicating atypical EPEC types. The EPEC strains were heterogeneous with regard to intimin types, such as eae-theta (three strains), eae-kappa (n = 3), eae-alpha 1 (n = 2), eae-iota (n = 2), one eae-alpha 2, eae-beta 1 and eae-eta each, and two were not typeable. The majority of the EPEC isolates adhered to HEp-2 cells in a localized adherence-like pattern and were positive for fluorescence actin staining. The EPEC strains belonged to 12 different serotypes, including O111:H25 and O125:H6, which are known to be pathogens in humans. Multi locus sequence typing revealed a close genetic similarity between the O111:H25 and O125:H6 strains from cats, dogs and humans. Our results show that domestic cats are colonized by EPEC, including serotypes previously described as human pathogens. As these EPEC strains are also isolated from humans, a cycle of mutual infection by EPEC between cats and its households cannot be ruled out, though the transmission dynamics among the reservoirs are not yet understood clearly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据