4.4 Article

Chelicerae as male grasping organs in scorpions: sexual dimorphism and associated behaviour

期刊

ZOOLOGY
卷 112, 期 5, 页码 332-350

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2009.01.002

关键词

Scorpiones; Clasping structures; Cheliceral grip; Sexual selection hypotheses; Sperm transfer

类别

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas of Argentina
  2. Secretaria de Ciencia y Tecnica of the Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
  3. The Animal Behaviour Society Developing Nations Research Grants
  4. AMNH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Specialised structures that enable males to grasp females during sexual interactions are highly susceptible to selection and thus diverge relatively rapidly over evolutionary time. These structures are often used to test hypotheses regarding sexual selection such as sexually antagonistic co-evolution and sexual selection by female choice. In the present study, we determine whether there is a relationship between a novel record of scorpion sexual dimorphism, the sexual dimorphism of chelicerae (CSD), and the presence of the mating behaviour termed cheliceral grip (CG). The presence of both traits in the order Scorpiones is also reviewed from a phylogenetic perspective. The results confirm a strong relationship between CSD and the presence of CG. The morphological and behavioural patterns associated with CSD-CG are opposed to the predictions postulated by the hypothesis of sexually antagonistic co-evolution. However, if the female shows resistance after the deposition of the spermatophore, the possibility that the male exerts pressure as a cryptic form of coercion to prevent the interruption of mating cannot be ruled out completely. Female choice by mechanical fit could be another explanation for some aspects of the CG's contact zone. The possibility that the CG-CSD complex has evolved under natural selection in order to ensure sperm transfer is also considered. (C) 2009 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据