4.1 Article

Phylogeography of the Salmonid Fish, Dolly Varden Salvelinus malma: Multiple Glacial Refugia in the North Pacific Rim

期刊

ZOOLOGICAL SCIENCE
卷 31, 期 10, 页码 660-670

出版社

ZOOLOGICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.2108/zs130266

关键词

glacial refugia; North Pacific rim; phylogeography; salmonid; Salvelinus malma

类别

资金

  1. 21st Century COE program on 'Neo-Science of Natural History' at Hokkaido University - Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [22510251]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22510251, 25450290] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The geographic distribution pattern of mitochondrial DNA (control region) sequence polymorphisms from 73 populations of a salmonid fish, Dolly Varden Salvelinus malma, over most of its range in the North Pacific rim, was examined to assess how its spatial population genetic structure has been molded. The observed 68 haplotypes were grouped into three main lineages, which correspond to western, central, and eastern regions in the North Pacific. The two outlier-haplotype groups gave close agreement with DNA types from two congeneric species, white-spotted charr S. leucomaenis and Arctic charr S. alpinus, respectively. These results suggest that the present-day genetic structure of S. malma reflects historical patterns of isolation and re-colonization, and also historical hybridization with co-distributed species. We also placed the haplotypes of S. malma within our study areas into a pre-existing evolutionary relationship of S. alpinus and S. malma throughout the Northern Hemisphere. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the Western Lineage S. malma was basal to all other lineages of S. malma and S. alpinus. Our data serve as a biogeographic hypothesis for salmonid fishes that the Sea of Japan and/ or Sea of Okhotsk regions represents a place of origin for S. malma and S. alpinus groups currently distributed in circumpolar regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据