4.5 Article

Phylogenetic relationships and taxonomy of Altiplano populations of Biomphalaria (Gastropoda: Planorbidae): inference from a multilocus approach

期刊

ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 165, 期 4, 页码 795-808

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00829.x

关键词

Chilean Altiplano; gastropods; freshwater snails; mitochondrial genes; nuclear ITS regions; systematics

类别

资金

  1. Domeyko: Biodiversidad Iniciativa Transversal 1 of the Universidad de Chile
  2. FONDECYT [1061256, 1080390, 1110188]
  3. [MULT 05/04-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Isolated closed basins provide a natural laboratory to study the differentiation among wild populations. Here we examined the phylogenetic relationships of the Southern Altiplano populations of Biomphalaria, a genus with medical importance, using nuclear (ITS1, ITS2) and mitochondrial (16S) ribosomal gene markers and a species of Helisoma as outgroup. Phylogenetic trees based on separate and combined analyses show that these populations form a particular lineage within Biomphalaria along with Biomphalaria peregrina (d'Orbigny, 1835) and Biomphalaria oligoza Paraense, 1974. The origin of this clade was estimated to have occurred in the middle Pleistocene. Molecular analyses showed that the nominal species Biomphalaria crequii (Courty, 1907) from the Salar de Ascotan and Biomphalaria costata (Biese, 1951) from the Salar de Carcote, previously synonymized with Biomphalaria andecola (d'Orbigny, 1835) and B. peregrina, respectively, are distinct taxa. Molecular data did not resolve the relationship of Biomphalaria aymara Valdovinos & Stuardo, 1991 from the Isluga swamps to other Biomphalaria species, but confirm that the populations from the Lauca and Huasco basins may represent a distinct undescribed species of Biomphalaria from the Southern Altiplano. Snails examined for trematodes were found to be positive in some Altiplano localities. (c) 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 165, 795808.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据