4.5 Article

Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of Hormaphidinae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) indicate Late Cretaceous tribal diversification

期刊

ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 165, 期 1, 页码 73-87

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00795.x

关键词

aphid; host alternation; molecular dating; phylogenetic relationship; specialization

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Sciences Foundation of China [NSFC-31025024, 30830017, 31061160186]
  2. Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Chinese Academy of Sciences [NSFC-30900133, O529YX5105]
  3. National Science Fund for Fostering Talents in Basic Research [J0930004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aphid subfamily Hormaphidinae is a good candidate for the study of the evolution of insect plant relationships. Most hormaphidine species depend on woody primary host plants and woody or herbaceous secondary host plants, and represent high host specificity, especially to their primary hosts. No detailed molecular phylogeny of Hormaphidinae has been reported, and the taxonomic positions of some taxa in this group remain unclear. To reconstruct major phylogenetic relationships and to understand the evolution of host association patterns for major lineages, we present the first detailed molecular phylogeny of Hormaphidinae, as inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences, using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian methods. The monophyly of Hormaphidinae and its three traditional tribes was supported, and a sister relationship between Hormaphidini and Nipponaphidini was suggested. Most inner relationships within tribes were also supported, and some novel relationships were revealed. Two subtribes of Cerataphidini are proposed. Divergence times estimated using a Bayesian approach indicate that tribal diversifications occurred during the Late Cretaceous and were coincident with the appearance of their primary host plants. The current pattern of secondary host association for the three tribes may have evolved in different time ranges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据