4.5 Article

The radiation of Satyrini butterflies (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae): a challenge for phylogenetic methods

期刊

ZOOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 161, 期 1, 页码 64-87

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00627.x

关键词

Bayesian; biogeography; diversity; grasses; habitat shift; host plants; likelihood; parsimony

类别

资金

  1. Amazon Conservation Association
  2. IDEA WILD
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. Academy of Finland [118369]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have inferred the most comprehensive phylogenetic hypothesis to date of butterflies in the tribe Satyrini. In order to obtain a hypothesis of relationships, we used maximum parsimony and model-based methods with 4435 bp of DNA sequences from mitochondrial and nuclear genes for 179 taxa (130 genera and eight out-groups). We estimated dates of origin and diversification for major clades, and performed a biogeographic analysis using a dispersal-vicariance framework, in order to infer a scenario of the biogeographical history of the group. We found long-branch taxa that affected the accuracy of all three methods. Moreover, different methods produced incongruent phylogenies. We found that Satyrini appeared around 42 Mya in either the Neotropical or the Eastern Palaearctic, Oriental, and/or Indo-Australian regions, and underwent a quick radiation between 32 and 24 Mya, during which time most of its component subtribes originated. Several factors might have been important for the diversification of Satyrini: the ability to feed on grasses; early habitat shift into open, non-forest habitats; and geographic bridges, which permitted dispersal over marine barriers, enabling the geographic expansions of ancestors to new environments that provided opportunities for geographic differentiation, and diversification. 'To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail'. Mark Twain (C) 2011 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 161, 64-87.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据