4.5 Article

Towards a phylogenetic classification of reef corals: the Indo-Pacific genera Merulina, Goniastrea and Scapophyllia (Scleractinia, Merulinidae)

期刊

ZOOLOGICA SCRIPTA
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 531-548

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12061

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [DEB-1145043-1145408]
  2. Wildlife Reserves Singapore Ah Meng Memorial Conservation Fund [R-154-000-507-720]
  3. LMC, KAUST [CRG-1-BER-002]
  4. JSPS KAKENHI [22370033]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22370033] Funding Source: KAKEN
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1145043] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advances in scleractinian systematics and taxonomy have been achieved through the integration of molecular and morphological data, as well as rigorous analysis using phylogenetic methods. In this study, we continue in our pursuit of a phylogenetic classification by examining the evolutionary relationships between the closely related reef coral genera Merulina, Goniastrea, Paraclavarina and Scapophyllia (Merulinidae). In particular, we address the extreme polyphyly of Favites and Goniastrea that was discovered a decade ago. We sampled 145 specimens belonging to 16 species from a wide geographic range in the Indo-Pacific, focusing especially on type localities, including the Red Sea, western Indian Ocean and central Pacific. Tree reconstructions based on both nuclear and mitochondrial markers reveal a novel lineage composed of three species previously placed in Favites and Goniastrea. Morphological analyses indicate that this clade, Paragoniastrea Huang, Benzoni & Budd, gen. n., has a unique combination of corallite and subcorallite features observable with scanning electron microscopy and thin sections. Molecular and morphological evidence furthermore indicates that the monotypic genus Paraclavarina is nested within Merulina, and the former is therefore synonymised.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据