4.5 Article

Exploration of data partitioning in an eight-gene data set: phylogeny of metalmark moths (Lepidoptera, Choreutidae)

期刊

ZOOLOGICA SCRIPTA
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 536-546

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2012.00551.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish Council for Independent Research/Natural Sciences [09-069287]
  2. Academy of Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rota, J. & Wahlberg, N. (2012). Exploration of data partitioning in an eight-gene data set: phylogeny of metalmark moths (Lepidoptera, Choreutidae). Zoologica Scripta, 41, 536546. Molecular data sets for phylogenetic inference continue to increase in size, especially with respect to the number of genes sampled. As more and more genes are included in analyses, the importance of partitioning the data to avoid problems that can arise from underparameterization becomes more apparent. With an eight-gene data set from 38 metalmark moth species (12 genera represented) and three outgroups, we explored different data partitioning strategies and their influence on convergence and mixing of Markov Chains Monte Carlo in a Bayesian setting. We found that in larger data sets, with an increase in the number of partitions that are made a priori (e.g. by gene and codon position), convergence and mixing become poor. This problem can be overcome by using a recently published algorithm in which homologous sites are grouped into blocks with similar evolutionary rates that can then be modelled as separate data subsets. Using this novel approach to data partitioning, our analyses resolve with strong support relationships among the genera of metalmark moths. Support for the monophyly of the family, the two subfamilies and all genera except Hemerophila is strong. Hemerophila is broken into two separate clades, Hemerophila sensu stricto and another well-supported clade. To render Hemerophila monophyletic, we describe a new genus, Ornarantia Rota, gen. nov., and transfer 18 species from Hemerophila to it. The type species of Ornarantia is Hemerophila laciniosella Busck, 1914.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据