4.5 Article

Northern genetic richness and southern purity, but just one species in the Chelonoidis chilensis complex

期刊

ZOOLOGICA SCRIPTA
卷 41, 期 3, 页码 220-232

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2012.00533.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fritz, U., Alcalde, L., Vargas-Ramirez, M., Goode, E. V., Fabius-Turoblin, D. U. & Praschag, P. (2012). Northern genetic richness and southern purity, but just one species in the Chelonoidis chilensis complex. - Zoologica Scripta, 41, 220-232. The Chelonoidis chilensis complex, the sister group of the famous Galapagos tortoises, is a widely distributed group of South American land tortoises, ranging from the dry Chaco of Bolivia, Paraguay and northern Argentina to northern Patagonia. Within this complex, up to three distinct species have been recognized. Using sequence data of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene and length polymorphisms of 10 microsatellite loci, we investigate genetic differentiation among all three nominal species. We find only negligible differentiation, with decreasing genetic diversity from north to south. We conclude that only one species, Chelonoidis chilensis (Gray, 1870), is valid, with C. donosobarrosi (Freiberg, 1973) and C. petersi (Freiberg, 1973) as its junior synonyms. Morphological variation within C. chilensis sensu lato is in accord with the observation that size variation in chelonians follows Bergmann's rule, with body size increasing with latitude. The observed phylogeographic differentiation inverses the well-known pattern of southern genetic richness and northern purity from the northern hemisphere, resulting from dispersal from glacial refugia. This implies that in higher latitudes of both hemispheres genetic diversity may decrease with increasing distance from the refugium. For C. chilensis sensu lato, it seems likely that long-distance dispersal via rafting on the Desaguadero River led to the foundation of the southernmost populations in northern Patagonia during the Holocene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据