4.4 Article

A world checklist of Onychophora (velvet worms), with notes on nomenclature and status of names

期刊

ZOOKEYS
卷 -, 期 211, 页码 1-70

出版社

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.211.3463

关键词

Peripatidae; Peripatopsidae; species list; catalogue; taxonomy

类别

资金

  1. PhD fellowship of the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [290029/2010-4]
  2. SYNTHESYS grant
  3. European Community Research Infrastructure Action FP7 Integrating Activities Programme
  4. Emmy Noether Programme of the German Research Foundation (DFG) [Ma 4147/3-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, the number of valid species of Onychophora is uncertain. To facilitate taxonomic work on this understudied animal group, we present an updated checklist for the two extant onychophoran subgroups, Peripatidae and Peripatopsidae, along with an assessment of the status of each species. According to our study, 82 species of Peripatidae and 115 species of Peripatopsidae have been described thus far. However, among these 197 species, 20 are nomina dubia due to major taxonomic inconsistencies. Apart from nomina dubia, many of the valid species also require revision, in particular representatives of Paraperipatus within the Peripatopsidae, and nearly all species of Peripatidae. In addition to extant representatives, the record of unambiguous fossils includes three species with uncertain relationship to the extant taxa. For all species, we provide a list of synonyms, information on types and type localities, as well as remarks on taxonomic and nomenclatural problems and misspellings. According to recent evidence of high endemism and cryptic speciation among the Peripatidae and Peripatopsidae, previous synonyms are revised. Puta-tive mutations, subspecies and variations are either raised to the species status or synonymised with corresponding taxa. In our revised checklist, we follow the rules and recommendations of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature to clarify previous inconsistencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据