4.4 Article

Conformal a-anomaly of some non-unitary 6d superconformal theories

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2015)017

关键词

Higher Spin Symmetry; AdS-CFT Correspondence; Conformal and W Symmetry; Supergravity Models

资金

  1. ERC Advanced grant [290456]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [14-42-00047]
  3. Lebedev Institute
  4. Russian Science Foundation [14-42-00047] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J000353/1, ST/L00044X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. STFC [ST/L00044X/1, ST/J000353/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We compute the conformal anomaly a-coefficient for some non-unitary (higher derivative or non-gauge-invariant) 6d conformal fields and their supermultiplets. We use the method based on a connection between 6d determinants on S-6 and 7d determinants on AdS(7). We find, in particular, that (1,0) supermultiplet containing 4-derivative gauge-invariant conformal vector has precisely the value of a-anomaly as attributed in arXiv: 1506.03807 (on the basis of R-symmetry and gravitational 't Hooft anomaly matching) to the standard (1,0) vector multiplet. We also show that higher derivative (2,0) 6d conformal supergravity coupled to exactly 26 (2,0) tensor multiplets has vanishing a-anomaly (and also vanishing Casimir energy on 5-sphere). This is the 6d counterpart of the known fact of cancellation of the conformal anomaly in the 4d system of N = 4 conformal supergravity coupled to 4 vector N = 4 multiplets. In the case when 5 of tensor multiplets are chosen to be ghost-like and the conformal symmetry is spontaneously broken by a quadratic scalar constraint the resulting IR theory may be identified with (2,0) Poincare supergravity coupled to 21 = 26 - 5 tensor multiplets. The latter theory is known to be special - it is gravitational anomaly free and results upon compactification of 10d type IIB supergravity on K3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据