4.1 Article

Silica-Based Nanoporous Materials

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/zaac.201300578

关键词

Color; Macroporous silica; Nanostructures; Structural pigments; Three-dimensionally ordered macroporous materials (3DOM)

资金

  1. NSF through the MRSEC program
  2. NSF through the ERC program
  3. NSF through the MRI program
  4. NSF through the NNIN program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Porous silica, structured as three-dimensionally ordered macroporous (3DOM) photonic crystal particles, is investigated as a pigment material with structural color. Brightly and uniformly colored 3DOM SiO2 powders were obtained by templating of a tetraethoxysilane-containing precursor in polymeric colloidal crystals, pyrolysis in an inert atmosphere to maintain a small amount (ca. 5-8 wt%) of residual carbon as a background absorber, and particle size reduction. The color depended on placing optical stop bands in the appropriate range of the visible spectrum. This was achieved through selection of the polymer sphere diameter in the colloidal crystal template and fine-tuning by the pyrolysis temperature, which controls the extent of condensation and shrinkage of the 3DOM SiO2 structure. The stop bands shifted to shorter wavelengths, and the chroma of these pigments increased with increasing pyrolysis temperature in the range from 475 to 900 degrees C. Using this temperature control, it was possible to obtain materials with a variety of colors and chroma using a single template sphere size. In addition, the assortment of spectral colors could be extended by mixing 3DOM SiO2 pigments with primary colors (red, green, blue) via a unique additive color-mixing mechanism, which distinguishes these pigments from most conventional pigments that rely on subtractive color mixing. These approaches enable the preparation of pigments with multiple colors using a single material composition, providing opportunities to replace potentially harmful dyes and pigments with nontoxic and relatively inert silica.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据