4.2 Review

Autophagy in Innate Recognition of Pathogens and Adaptive Immunity

期刊

YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 241-247

出版社

YONSEI UNIV COLL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.241

关键词

Autophagy; pathogen recognition; pattern recognition receptors; antigen presentation

资金

  1. Korean Health Technology RD Project [A100920]
  2. National R&D Program for Cancer Control [1020230]
  3. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
  4. National Research Foundation [2010-0012891]
  5. Converging Research Center [2011K000864]
  6. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of Korea [2011K000864]
  7. Korea Health Promotion Institute [A100920, 1020230] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  8. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0012891] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autophagy is a specialized cellular pathway involved in maintaining homeostasis by degrading long-lived cellular proteins and organelles. Recent studies have demonstrated that autophagy is utilized by immune systems to protect host cells from invading pathogens and regulate uncontrolled immune responses. During pathogen recognition, induction of autophagy by pattern recognition receptors leads to the promotion or inhibition of consequent signaling pathways. Furthermore, autophagy plays a role in the delivery of pathogen signatures in order to promote the recognition thereof by pattern recognition receptors. In addition to innate recognition, autophagy has been shown to facilitate MHC class II presentation of intracellular antigens to activate CD4 T cells. In this review, we describe the roles of autophagy in innate recognition of pathogens and adaptive immunity, such as antigen presentation, as well as the clinical relevance of autophagy in the treatment of human diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据