4.2 Article

Co-Immunization of Plasmid DNA Encoding IL-12 and IL-18 with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Vaccine against Progressive Tuberculosis

期刊

YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL
卷 52, 期 6, 页码 1008-1015

出版社

YONSEI UNIV COLLEGE MEDICINE
DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.6.1008

关键词

Tuberculosis; BCG; IL-12; IL-18; DNA vaccine

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST), Republic of Korea [K21001001623-10B1300-03110]
  3. Yonsei University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine has widely been used to immunize against tuberculosis, but its protective efficacy is variable in adult pulmonary tuberculosis, while it is not efficiently protective against progressive infection of virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. In this study, the protective effects of plasmid DNA vaccine constructs encoding IL-12 or IL-18 with the BCG vaccine were evaluated against progressive infection of M tuberculosis, using mouse aerosol challenge model. Materials and Methods: Plasmid DNA vaccine constructs encoding IL-12 or IL-18 were constructed and mice were immunized with the BCG vaccine or with IL-12 DNA or IL-18 DNA vaccine constructs together with the BCG vaccine. Results: The BCG vaccine induced high level of interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) but co-immunization of IL-12 or IL-18 DNA vaccine constructs with the BCG vaccine induced significantly higher level of IFN-gamma than a single BCG vaccine. The BCG vaccine was highly protective at early stage of M tuberculosis infection, but its protective efficacy was reduced at later stage of infection. The co-immunization of IL-12 DNA vaccine constructs with the BCG vaccine was slightly more protective at early stage of infection and was significantly more protective at later stage infection than a single BCG vaccine. Conclusion: Co-immunization of IL-12 DNA vaccine with the BCG vaccine induced more protective immunity and was more effective for protection against progressive infection of M. tuberculosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据