4.3 Article

Characterization, Dissolution, and Solubility of Lead Hydroxypyromorphite [Pb-5(PO4)(3)OH] at 25-45 degrees C

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
卷 2015, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2015/269387

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC41263009]
  2. Guangxi Science and Technology Development Project [GuiKeGong14124004-3-3, GuiKeZhong1298002-3]
  3. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi [2012GXNSFDA053022]
  4. Project of High Level Innovation Team and Outstanding Scholar in Guangxi Colleges and Universities [002401013001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dissolution of the hydroxypyromorphite [lead hydroxyapatite, Pb-5(PO4)(3)OH] in HNO3 solution (pH = 2.00), ultrapure water (pH = 5.60), and NaOH solution (pH = 9.00) was experimentally studied at 25 degrees C, 35 degrees C, and 45 degrees C. The XRD, FT-IR, and FE-SEM analyses indicated that the hydroxypyromorphite solids were observed to have indistinguishable change during dissolution. For the hydroxypyromorphite dissolution in aqueous acidic media at initial pH 2.00 and 25 degrees C, the aqueous phosphate concentrations rose quickly and reached the peak values after 1 h dissolution, while the aqueous lead concentrations rose slowly and reached the peak values after 1440 h. The solution Pb/P molar ratio increased constantly from 1.10 to 1.65 near the stoichiometric ratio of 1.67 to 209.85 similar to 597.72 and then decreased to 74.76 degrees 237.26 for the dissolution at initial pH 2.00 and 25 degrees C similar to 45 degrees C. The average K-sp values for Pb-5(PO4)(3)OH were determined to be 10-(80.77) (10-(80.57)-10-(80.96)) at 25 degrees C, 10-(80.65) (10-(80.38)-10-(80.99)) at 35 degrees C, and 10-(79.96) (10-(79.38)-10-(80.71)) at 45 degrees C. From the obtained solubility data for the dissolution at initial pH 2.00 and 25 degrees C, the Gibbs free energy of formation [Delta G(f)(0)] for Pb-5(PO4)(3)OH was calculated to be -3796.71 kJ/mol (-3795.55 similar to -3797.78 kJ/mol).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据