4.1 Article

Preliminary Study to Identify the Predictive Factors for the Response to Methotrexate Therapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

出版社

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/yakushi.129.843

关键词

rheumatoid arthritis; methotrexate; methotrexate-polyglutamates; polymorphism; clinical trial

资金

  1. Japan Research Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To identify the major factors predicting the response to Methotrexate (MTX) therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, we evaluated the relationship between the response to MTX and factors such as the concentration of MTX-polyglutamates (MTX-PGs) in erythrocytes (RBCs), genotypes of thymidylate synthase (TYMS) 5'-UTR (2R/3R) and 3'-UTR (-6/+6), 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T and A1298C, and other patient-related factors. Thirty-six Japanese RA patients were enrolled in this cohort study. The concentrations of MTX-PGs in RBCs were measured, and polymorphisms were determined using PCR-RFLP method. As an indicator of the accumulated capacity of MTX-PGs in the RBCs of each patient, the MTX dose/MTX-PGs (AC-MPG, 1/week) was calculated. The response to MTX therapy was assessed using the MTX dose for a >= 50% decrease in CRP level (MTX dose for 50% CRP, mg/week), and the relationships between MTX dose for 50%CRP and various other factors were evaluated using multiple linear regression analysis. The MTX dose was 6.9 +/- 0.3 mg/week and the MTX-PGs concentration in RBCs was 97.3 +/- 8.1 nmol/1 (n=36, blood samples=95, mean +/- S.D.). The range of MTX dose for 50%CRP was 2.0-13.0 mg/week. Most individual AC-MPG levels showed no change during the evaluation period (coefficient of variation=5.9%). Based on the results of multiple linear regression analysis, AC-MPG, TYMS 3'-UTR (-6/+6), and ESR at the start of MTX therapy were associated with the MTX dose for 50%CRP. AC-MPG, TYMS 3'-UTR (-6/+6), and ESR might be the major predictive factors for the response to MTX therapy in Japanese RA patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据