4.2 Article

Intestinal absorption mechanisms of berberine, palmatine, jateorhizine, and coptisine: involvement of P-glycoprotein

期刊

XENOBIOTICA
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 290-296

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00498254.2010.529180

关键词

Coptis chinensis; isoquinoline alkaloids; transport; Caco-2 cells; P-gp; MRP2

资金

  1. Doctor Subject Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China [200802680010]
  2. Shanghai Natural Science Founding [10ZR1430800]
  3. National Major Program for Clinical Evaluation Research Technology platform of Viral Hepatitis Novel Traditional Chinese Medicine Production [2008ZX09312-023]
  4. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [J50303]
  5. Construction Program for Innovative Research Team in Shanghai Institutions of Higher Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The absorption and transport mechanisms of berberine, palmatine, jateorhizine, and coptisine were studied using a Caco-2 cells uptake and transport model, with the addition of cyclosporin A and verapamil as P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors and MK-571 as a multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2) inhibitor. In the uptake experiment, berberine, palmatine, jateorhizine, and coptisine were all taken into Caco-2 cells, and their uptakes were increased in the presence of cyclosporin A or verapamil. In the transport experiment, P-app (AP-BL) was between 0.1 and 1.0 xx 10 2. Cyclosporin A and verapamil both increased P-app (AP-BL) but decreased P-app (BL-AB) for berberine, palmatine, jateorhizine, and coptisine; ER values were decreased by > 50%. MK-571 had no influence on the transmembrane transport of berberine, palmatine, jateorhizine, and coptisine. At a concentration of 1--100 mu mu M, berberine, palmatine, jateorhizine, and coptisine had no significant effects on the bidirection transport of Rho123. Berberine, palmatine, jateorhizine, and coptisine were all P-gp substrates; and at the range of 1--100 mu mu M, berberine, palmatine, jateorhizine, and coptisine had no inhibitory effects on P-gp.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据