4.2 Article

Effect of sodium tanshinone II A sulfonate on the activity of CYP1A2 in healthy volunteers

期刊

XENOBIOTICA
卷 39, 期 7, 页码 508-513

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00498250902951763

关键词

Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate; CYP1A2; caffeine; paraxanthine; induce

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30572226, 30472054, 30801421, 30528026, 30672497, 30500623]
  2. National Ministry of Education [20070533002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate (STS) is a water-soluble derivative of tanshinone IIA, a famous Chinese medicine which has been used in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders for many years. Using caffeine as a probe drug, this project was designed to investigate the effect of STS on the activity of CYP1A2 in humans. 2. Sixteen unrelated healthy volunteers were recruited for this two-phase, randomized and crossover study. The volunteers received either placebo or 60 mg day(-1) of STS injections through vein for 13 days. Pharmacokinetics of caffeine and the metabolite paraxanthine was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. CYP1A2 activity was monitored by the ratio of paraxanthine to caffeine at 6 h in plasma. 3. Enzyme activity analysis showed that STS significantly increased the activity of CYP1A2 by 41.1% [90% confidence interval (CI), 17.4-64.8%] (p = 0.036). The area under the curve [AUC((0-24h))] of caffeine significantly decreased by 13.3% [90% CI = 7.0-19.6%] (p = 0.005) with 13 days of treatment of STS. AUC((0-24h)) of paraxanthine significantly increased by 17.4% [90% CI = 4.3-30.5%] (P = 0.035). No significant difference was found for other parameters of caffeine and paraxanthine between two phases. 4. STS has significantly induced the activity of CYP1A2 in vivo. Simultaneously, AUC((0-24h)) of caffeine and paraxanthine were significantly affected by STS. The findings have provided some useful information for safe and effective usage of STS in clinic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据