4.2 Article

Pre-clinical pharmacokinetics of UK-453,061, a novel non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), and use of in silico physiologically based prediction tools to predict the oral pharmacokinetics of UK-453,061 in man

期刊

XENOBIOTICA
卷 38, 期 6, 页码 620-640

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00498250802069088

关键词

physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK); pharmacokinetics; inter-species scaling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. UK-453,061 is a novel second-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). Following intravenous bolus administration of UK-453,061 in male rat and infusion administration in dog, UK-453,061 had the following mean pharmacokinetic properties: elimination T-1/2 of 1.6 and 2.4h, CLp of 26 and 10 mlmin(-1) kg(-1) and V-ss of 1.6 and 21 kg(-1), respectively. 2. The half-lives of UK-453,061 disappearance in recombinant human CYPs 2C8, 2C9, 2A6, 2E1, 1A2, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A4 were 71, 100, 56, 101, 61, 34, 60 and 8min, respectively. The disappearance half-life of UK-453,061 in human liver microsomes in the presence of UDPGA was 90 min. 3. Human clearance values were predicted using single-species scaling from in vivo data and from in vitro data using SimCYP. The human distribution of UK-453,061 was estimated using an in silico, physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) methodology and absorption was predicted from measured physicochemical, permeability, and solubility data using GastroPlus and SimCYP. The C-max was predicted to be 68, 185, 149% of the actual mean value using rat, dog and in vitro predicted values of human clearance at 30mg and 53, 150, 29% of actual at 500mg. The area under the curve (AUC) was predicted to be 73, 285 and 142% of the actual mean value using rat, dog and in vitro predicted values of human clearance at 30 mg and 52, 212 and 35% of actual at 500 mg. 4. This study demonstrates the utility of using in silico PBPK approaches to make predictions of human pharmacokinetics before dosing for the first time in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据