4.2 Review

Human equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT) family of nucleoside and nucleobase transporter proteins

期刊

XENOBIOTICA
卷 38, 期 7-8, 页码 995-1021

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00498250801927427

关键词

nucleoside; nucleobase; transporter; equilibrative; equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT); anticancer nucleoside drugs; antiviral nucleoside drugs

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council Funding Source: Medline
  3. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. The human (h) SLC29 family of integral membrane proteins is represented by four members, designated equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENTs) because of the properties of the first-characterized family member, hENT1. They belong to the widely distributed eukaryotic ENT family of equilibrative and concentrative nucleoside/nucleobase transporter proteins. 2. A predicted topology of eleven transmembrane helices has been experimentally confirmed for hENT1. The best-characterized members of the family, hENT1 and hENT2, possess similar broad permeant selectivities for purine and pyrimidine nucleosides, but hENT2 also efficiently transports nucleobases. hENT3 has a similar broad permeant selectivity for nucleosides and nucleobases and appears to function in intracellular membranes, including lysosomes. 3. hENT4 is uniquely selective for adenosine, and also transports a variety of organic cations. hENT3 and hENT4 are pH sensitive, and optimally active under acidic conditions. ENTs, including those in parasitic protozoa, function in nucleoside and nucleobase uptake for salvage pathways of nucleotide synthesis and, in humans, are also responsible for the cellular uptake of nucleoside analogues used in the treatment of cancers and viral diseases. 4. By regulating the concentration of adenosine available to cell surface receptors, mammalian ENTs additionally influence physiological processes ranging from cardiovascular activity to neurotransmission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据