4.4 Article

Interleukin-10 reduces scar formation in both animal and human cutaneous wounds: Results of two preclinical and phase II randomized control studies

期刊

WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 428-436

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12043

关键词

-

资金

  1. Johnson and Johnson
  2. Renovo Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cutaneous scarring affects up to 100million people per annum. There is no effective scar reducing/preventing therapeutic developed to date. Interleukin (IL)-10 is an anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic cytokine. In the embryo it is important for scarless wound repair. We investigated the effect on wound healing and scarring of a double deletion of the IL-10 and IL-4 genes in a knockout (KO) mouse model, and also the effect of exogenous addition of recombinant human (rh) IL-10 into rat and human cutaneous incisions. Mouse study: Two incisions were made on the dorsal skin of 20 double IL-4/IL-10 KO mice and 20 wild-type (WT) controls. Rat study: Three concentrations of rhIL-10 were investigated. Four incisions were made on the dorsal skin of 30 rats. Each rat received two concentrations. Each incision receiving a concentration of rhIL-10 was matched with a control incision, which received either placebo or standard care. Human study: Eight concentrations of rhIL-10 were investigated. Four incisions were made on each arm of 175 healthy volunteers. Four incisions received four different concentrations, which were matched with four control incisions that received either standard care or placebo. KO mice healed with poor scar histology and increased inflammation. rhIL-10treated rat incisions healed with decreased inflammation, better scar histology, and better macroscopic scar appearance. rhIL-10treated human incisions at low concentrations healed with better macroscopic scar appearance and less red scars. IL-10 is an important cytokine in wound healing and its suppression of inflammation and scarring is demonstrated in mice and rats with a translational effect in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据