4.5 Article

Long-term results of thulium laser resection of the prostate: a prospective study at multiple centers

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 503-508

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1456-5

关键词

Thulium laser resection of the prostatectomy; Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Laser surgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To evaluate the long-term durability and complication rates after thulium laser resection of prostate (TmLRP) through a prospective multiple-center study. From November 2004 to December 2011, we prospectively studied 2,216 patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with thulium laser resection of the prostate at four medical centers. Patients were assessed on International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)), and postvoid residual urine (PVR). Perioperative complications were classified according to the modified Clavien classification system. Of 2,216 patients treated with TmLRP, 1,353 (61.1 %), 1,129 (50.9 %), 847 (38.2 %), and 541 (24.4 %) patients were followed at 5, 6, 7, and 8 years, respectively. Postoperatively, IPSS, QoL, Q(max,) and PVR showed a significant improvement from 3 month after surgery and remained significantly improved during the entire follow-up period (p < 0.01). Minor complications occurred in 526 (23.7 %) of the 2,216 patients (Clavien 1: 21.5 %; Clavien 2: 2.3 %). Major complications requiring re-interventions occurred in 48 (2.2 %) of the 2,216 patients (Clavien 3: 2.2 %). No Clavien 4 or Clavien 5 complication had occurred. Urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture occurred in 2.6 % (58) and 1.6 % (35) patients, respectively. Persistent stress incontinence was found in 0.1 % (2) of the patients. Re-operation as a result of BPH recurrence was required in 1.2 % (27) patients. Thulium laser resection of the prostate is a safe and effective procedure with excellent durability in the treatment of symptomatic BPH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据