4.5 Article

Ki67 staining index and neuroendocrine differentiation aggravate adverse prognostic parameters in prostate cancer and are characterized by negligible inter-observer variability

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 243-250

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-008-0257-0

关键词

prostate cancer; prognostic outcome; Ki67 staining index; neuroendocrine differentiation; inter-observer variability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction This study aims to clarify whether neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) and/or proliferation activity assessed by means of Ki67 staining index (Ki67SI) might aggravate other established adverse prognostic parameters commonly used for predicting outcome in surgically treated prostate cancer, and to assess inter-observer variability in assigning NED and Ki67 SI. Material and methods A total of 528 patients surgically treated due to prostate cancer were evaluated in this study. Relevant data were retrospectively obtained by chart review. Immunostaining with antibodies directed against Chromogranin A and Ki67 was performed on archived surgical material, and was evaluated by two independent histopathologists blinded to the specimens. Surveying a median postsurgical follow-up of 46.4 months, postsurgical serum PSA-levels were regularly documented for identifying biochemical progress. Multivariate analysis was performed by means of the Cox regression hazards regression method to evaluate possible aggravations of established adverse prognostic parameters (nodal status, tumour stage, pretherapeutic PSA-level, and Gleason score) by NED and/or Ki67SI. Ki67 SI and NED were shown to significantly aggravate these established adverse prognostic parameters, and were found to be characterized by negligible inter-observer variability. Conclusion Ki67 SI and NED should be advocated to be rendered by the histopathologist because both parameters can be immunohistochemically determined without much additional expense in time and cost involved. This concept is rewarded by an additional gain of prognostic accuracy in evaluating individual risk profile after surgery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据