4.5 Article

Role of Caudate Lobectomy in Type IIIA and IIIB Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A 15-year Experience in a Tertiary Institution

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 36, 期 5, 页码 1112-1121

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1497-0

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Concomitant liver resection for type III hilar cholangiocarcinoma could improve the R0 resection rate and long-term outcome. In the present study, we examine the specific role of caudate lobectomy in liver resection for type IIIA and IIIB hilar cholangiocarcinoma and the prognostic factors for survival in this group of patients. Methods We reviewed all patients with type IIIA and IIIB hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent liver resection in Samsung Medical Center from January 1995 to July 2010. Patients were divided into those with and without caudate lobectomy (CL). The log rank test and Cox regression analysis were employed to investigate for prognostic factors of survival. Results There were 127 patients in this cohort, 57 without CL (44.9%) and 70 with CL (55.1%). The demographics and symptoms of presentation were comparable. The median preoperative bilirubin level was significantly higher in the group undergoing CL (p = 0.017). Patients with CL had a significantly better overall survival (OS) (CL: 64.0 months vs without CL: 34.6 months) (p = 0.010) and disease-free survival (DFS) (CL: 40.5 months vs without CL: 27.0 months) (p = 0.031). Multivariate analysis showed that presence of symptoms (p = 0.025) and positive lymph node (LN) metastasis (p < 0.001) were negative prognostic factors for OS. Furthermore, multivariate analysis for DFS found that caudate lobectomy (p = 0.016) and positive LN metastasis (p = 0.001) were positive and negative prognostic factors, respectively. Conclusions Caudate lobectomy contributed to improvement of DFS and OS in type III hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Other prognostic factors include positive LN metastasis and presence of symptoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据