4.5 Article

Utilisation of a Level 1 Trauma Centre in KwaZulu-Natal: Appropriateness of Referral Determines Trauma Patient Access

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 37, 期 7, 页码 1544-1549

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1890-8

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Appropriate referral of major trauma patients to an accredited Level 1 Trauma facility is associated with improved outcome. A new Level 1 Trauma Centre was opened at Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital in March 2007. This study sought to audit the referral pattern of external consults to the trauma unit and ascertain whether the unit was receiving appropriate referrals and has adequate capacity. An audit was performed of the referral proformas used in the unit to record admission decisions and of the computerised trauma database. The audit examined referral source (scene vs. interhospital), regional distribution, and final decision regarding admission of the injured patients. The study was approved by the UKZN Ethics Committee (BE207/09 and 011/010). Of the 1,212 external consults, 540 were accepted for admission while the rest were not accepted for various reasons. These included 206 cases where no bed was available, 233 did not meet admission criteria (minor injury or futile situation), and 115 were for subspecialty management of a single-system injury. Finally, 115 were initially refused pending stabilisation for transfer at a regional facility. Twenty-six percent of the cases were referrals from the scene, with an acceptance rate of 96 %. Most patients (59 %) were from the local eThekwini region. Major multiorgan system trauma remains a significant public health burden in KwaZulu-Natal. A Level 1 Trauma Service is used appropriately in most circumstances. However, the additional need for more hospital facilities that provide such services across the whole province to enable effective geographical coverage for those trauma patients requiring such specialised trauma care is essential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据