4.5 Article

Parathyroid Carcinoma: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 33, 期 11, 页码 2343-2354

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-9999-0

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The goal of the present study was to make our medical practice evidence-based for patients with parathyroid carcinoma. Methods We posed six clinical questions relevant to the management of parathyroid cancer. A comprehensive search and critical appraisal of the literature was then carried out. Results Most of the literature retrieved was retrospective in design and differed in the definition of carcinoma. The distinction between unequivocal and equivocal carcinoma (or atypical adenoma) was not always made for the study populations. None of the studies indicated reproducibility of outcome measures. Of the histopathological features described in the literature based on the description of Schantz and Castleman, capsular/vascular invasions and trabecular growth pattern were the most specific, and fibrous bands were the most sensitive. None of the patients with atypical adenoma'' developed recurrence, whereas 25% of those with equivocal carcinoma'' did. Mutations in HRPT2, the gene responsible for hereditary hyperparathyroidism with jaw-tumor syndrome, were strongly associated with sporadic parathyroid carcinoma. Severe hypercalcemia and its related clinical symptoms, extremely high levels of parathyroid hormone, osteitis fibrosa cystica, a palpable neck mass, and a relatively large depth-width ratio on ultrasonography, are the important features of parathyroid carcinoma. Disease-specific survival rates reported in the literature were varied, reflecting the differences in the definitions of carcinoma, study populations, and interventions. Conclusions To establish valid evidence for patient management in the future, a collaboration of endocrine specialists is essential to conduct well-designed clinical studies for this rare disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据