4.5 Article

Surgical resection of stage IV colorectal cancer and prognosis

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 1130-1137

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9535-7

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) harbors accumulated genetic alterations with cancer progression, which results in uncontrollable disease. To regulate the most malignant CRC, we have to know the most dismal phenotype of stage IV disease. Methods A retrospective review of the Kitasato University Hospital was performed (from 1990 to 2001) to extract the 162 resected stage IV CRC. Clinical variables were tested for their relationship to survival in a multivariate prognostic analysis and revealed the interaction of the prognostic factors. Results In stage IV CRC with noncurable resection, the most robust univariate predictors for poor prognosis were preoperative high value of CA19-9, peritoneal dissemination, depth of invasion, age, extent of liver metastases, pathologic lymph node metastasis status, and gender as tumor factors, and postoperative therapy, perioperative transfusion, and lymph node dissection extent as treatment factors. Among these factors, postoperative therapy (p < 0.0001), perioperative transfusion (0.0002), CA19-9 (0.001), extent of liver metastases (0.004), and peritoneal dissemination (0.02) were identified as independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis. Interestingly, among the independent prognostic factors, treatment factors did not depend upon tumor factors and the combination of the three tumor factors (CA19-9, extent of liver metastases, and peritoneal dissemination) can clearly classify the patients into the definite prognostic groups. Conclusion Our results suggested that the most dismal CRC harbors three definite vectors that may represent the strongest phenotype of putative systemic immune (CA19-9), distant metastasis (extent of liver metastases), and local progression (peritoneal dissemination).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据