4.5 Article

Perineural Invasion Is a Prognostic Factor in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 32, 期 11, 页码 2395-2402

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9726-2

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Perineural invasion is commonly observed in biliary tract cancer and is an independent prognostic factor. Since intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) develops from biliary epithelia in the liver, ICC may share the same characteristics in terms of the prognostic implications of perineural invasion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of perineural invasion in ICC. Methods A total of 59 patients with ICC who underwent hepatectomy were retrospectively reviewed. The numbers of nerves with and without tumor involvement were counted. The perineural invasion index (PNI) was calculated as the number of involved nerves divided by the total number of nerves examined. Predictors for perineural invasion and prognostic factors were analyzed. Results Perineural invasion was observed in 47 of 59 (80%) patients, and the median PNI was 0.082. The macroscopic tumor appearance and tumor location were significantly associated with perineural invasion (p = 0.013 and 0.032, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses (excluding seven in-hospital deaths) revealed that histologic grade, the presence of perineural invasion, nodal metastasis, and intrahepatic metastasis were independent prognostic factors. The survival rate of the patients with (n = 42) or without (n = 10) perineural invasion was 17 and 80% at 3 years; and 17 and 70% at 5 years, respectively (p = 0.001). Conclusion Perineural invasion is frequently found in patients with ICC and is an independent prognostic factor. ICC is an aggressive tumor similar to other biliary tract cancers. Because perineural invasion is a histologic marker of aggressiveness, it potentially has a role as a determinant of patient selection for adjuvant therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据