4.5 Article

Design of a recombinant Escherichia coli for producing L-phenylalanine from glycerol

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 28, 期 10, 页码 2937-2943

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-012-1104-4

关键词

Phenylalanine dehydrogenase; L-Phenylalanine; Glycerol facilitator; Aromatic amino acid exporter; Bacillus lentus; Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)

资金

  1. Office of the Higher Education Commission, Thailand
  2. Chulalongkorn University
  3. Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A recombinant Escherichia coli was engineered to produce the commercially important amino acid l-phenylalanine (l-Phe) using glycerol as the carbon source. Compared to the conventionally used glucose and sucrose, glycerol is a less expensive carbon source. As phenylalanine dehydrogenase (PheDH) activity is involved in the last step of l-Phe synthesis in E. coli, a phenylalanine dehydrogenase gene (phedh) from the thermotolerant Bacillus lentus was cloned into pRSFDuet-1 (pPheDH) and expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3). The resulting clone had a limited ability to produce l-Phe from glycerol, possibly because of a poor glycerol uptake by the cell, or an inability to excrete l-Phe, or both. Therefore, yddG gene encoding an aromatic amino acid exporter and glpF gene encoding a glycerol transport facilitator were coexpressed with the phedh in a reengineered E. coli. In a glycerol medium, the maximum l-Phe production rates of the clones pPY (phedh and yddG genes) and pPYF (phedh, yddG and glpF genes) were 1.4- and 1.8-fold higher than the maximum production rate of the pPheDH clone. The better producing pPYF clone was further evaluated in a 5 l stirred-tank fermenter (37 A degrees C, an aeration rate of 1 vvm, an agitation speed of 400 rpm). In the fermenter, the maximum concentration of l-Phe (366 mg/l) was achieved in a much shorter period compared to in the shake flasks. In the latter, the highest titer of l-Phe was only 76 % of the maximum value attained in the fermenter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据