4.5 Article

Laboratory production and characterization of a new biosurfactant from Candida glabrata UCP1002 cultivated in vegetable fat waste applied to the removal of hydrophobic contaminant

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 1683-1692

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-010-0346-2

关键词

Biosurfactant; Candida glabrata; Petroleum contamination; Surface tension; Waste

资金

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  2. Foundation for the Support of Science and Technology of the State of Pernambuco (FACEPE)
  3. Catholic University of Pernambuco (UNICAP), Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biosurfactant production by Candida glabrata was studied using vegetable fat waste as substrate. A factorial design was initially carried out to investigate the effects and interactions of waste, yeast extract and glucose on the surface tension after 144 h cultivation. Maximum surface tension reduction was achieved with vegetable fat waste at 5% and yeast extract at 0.2%. The biosurfactant containing cell-free broth retained its surface-active properties after incubation at high temperatures, at a wide range of pH values and salt concentrations. Comparison between three solvent systems for surfactant recovery showed that ethyl acetate extracted both crude extracellular and intracellular biosurfactant with high product recovery. The isolated extracellular biosurfactant showed a CMC of 1% and the surface tension at that point was 24 mN m(-1). Preliminary chemical composition revealed the presence of carbohydrates, proteins and lipids. The application of the crude biosurfactant to a soil-water-hydrophobic contaminant system was investigated and the apparent critical micelle concentration was determined at 7% of the broth, although the best oil removal (92.6%) had been obtained with 10% of the cell-free broth. The cost of application of the biosurfactant in soils was estimated based on the cost of a commercial biosurfactant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据