4.6 Article

Epidemiological transition of colorectal cancer in developing countries: Environmental factors, molecular pathways, and opportunities for prevention

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 20, 期 20, 页码 6055-6072

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6055

关键词

Colorectal cancer; Developing countries; Environment; Diet; Nuclear receptors; Gut microbiota

资金

  1. Institutional NRSA, clinical oncology research training program [T32 CA079447]
  2. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), Milan
  3. Office for the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Internationalization, G. d'Annunzio University, Chieti
  4. Carichieti Foundation, Chieti
  5. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca (MIUR), Rome, Italy
  6. Fondazione Umberto Veronesi, Milan, Italy
  7. MRC [5PT57]
  8. MRC [MC_UP_A090_1006] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A090_1006] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer and cancer-related mortality worldwide. The disease has been traditionally a major health problem in industrial countries, however the CRC rates are increasing in the developing countries that are undergoing economic growth. Several environmental risk factors, mainly changes in diet and life style, have been suggested to underlie the rise of CRC in these populations. Diet and lifestyle impinge on nuclear receptors, on the intestinal microbiota and on crucial molecular pathways that are implicated in intestinal carcinogenesis. In this respect, the epidemiological transition in several regions of the world offers a unique opportunity to better understand CRC carcinogenesis by studying the disease phenotypes and their environmental and molecular associations in different populations. The data from these studies may have important implications for the global prevention and treatment of CRC. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据