4.6 Article

Hepatitis C virus NS5A inhibitors and drug resistance mutations

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 20, 期 11, 页码 2902-2912

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i11.2902

关键词

ACH-3102; Direct-acting antiviral agents; Daclatasvir; Hepatitis C virus; Ledipasvir

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  2. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some direct-acting antiviral agents for hepatitis C virus (HCV), such as telaprevir and boceprevir have been available since 2011. It was reported that HCV NS5A is associated with interferon signaling related to HCV replication and hepatocarcinogenesis. HCV NS5A inhibitors efficiently inhibited HCV replication in vitro. Human studies showed that dual, triple and quad regimens with HCV NS5A inhibitors, such as daclatasvir and ledipasvir, in combination with other direct-acting antiviral agents against other regions of HCV with or without peginterferon/ribavirin, could efficiently inhibit HCV replication according to HCV genotypes. These combinations might be a powerful tool for difficult-to-treat HCV-infected patients. First generation HCV NS5A inhibitors such as daclatasvir, ledipasvir and ABT-267, which are now in phase. clinical trials, could result in resistance mutations. Second generation NS5A inhibitors such as GS-5816, ACH-3102, and MK-8742, have displayed improvements in the genetic barrier while maintaining potency. HCV NS5A inhibitors are safe at low concentrations, which make them attractive for use despite low genetic barriers, although, in fact, HCV NS5A inhibitors should be used with HCV NS3/4A inhibitors, HCV NS5B inhibitors or peginterferon plus ribavirin. This review article describes HCV NS5A inhibitor resistance mutations and recommends that HCV NS5A inhibitors be used in combination regimens potent enough to prevent the emergence of resistant variants. (c) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据