4.6 Article

Molecular mechanisms of chemopreventive phytochemicals against gastroenterological cancer development

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 19, 期 7, 页码 984-993

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i7.984

关键词

Curcumin; Resveratrol; (-)-Epigallocatechin gallate; Isothiocyanates; Sulforaphane; Gastroenterological cancers; Molecular target

资金

  1. Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (Plant Molecular Breeding Center) [PJ008187]
  2. Rural Development Administration
  3. Leap Research Program [2010-0029233]
  4. World Class University Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea [R31-2008-00-10056-0]
  5. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, South Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Commonly used cancer treatments, including chemotherapy and radiation therapy, often have side effects and a complete cure is sometimes impossible. Therefore, prevention, suppression, and/or delaying the onset of the disease are important. The onset of gastroenterological cancers is closely associated with an individual's lifestyle. Thus, changing lifestyle, specifically the consumption of fruits and vegetables, can help to protect against the development of gastroenterological cancers. In particular, naturally occurring bioactive compounds, including curcumin, resveratrol, isothiocyanates, (-)-epigallocatechin gallate and sulforaphane, are regarded as promising chemopreventive agents. Hence, regular consumption of these natural bioactive compounds found in foods can contribute to prevention, suppression, and/or delay of gastroenterological cancer development. In this review, we will summarize natural phytochemicals possessing potential antioxidant and/or anti-inflammatory and anti-carcinogenic activities, which are exerted by regulating or targeting specific molecules against gastroenterological cancers, including esophageal, gastric and colon cancers. (C) 2013 Baishideng. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据