4.6 Article

Schistosoma japonicum ova maintains epithelial barrier function during experimental colitis

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 17, 期 43, 页码 4810-4816

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBL GRP CO LTD
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i43.4810

关键词

Crohn's disease; Schistosoma japonicum ova; Tight junction protein; ZO-1; Occludin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To evaluate the impacts of Schistosoma japonicum (S. japonicum) ova on the tight junction barriers in a trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis model. METHODS: Balb/c mice were randomly divided into three groups: control group; TNBS(+)ova(-) group and TNBS(+)ova(+) group. TNBS was used intracolonic to induce colitis and mice of the TNBS(+)ova(+) group were pre-exposed to S. japonicum ova as a prophylactic intervention. Colon inflammation was quantified using following variables: mouse mortality, weight loss, colon extent and microscopic inflammation score. Serum expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma were assessed to evaluate the systemic inflammatory response. NOD2 and its mRNA were also tested. Bacterial translocations were tested by culturing blood and several tissues. ZO-1 and occludin were chosen as the representations of tight junction proteins. Both the proteins and mRNA were assessed. RESULTS: Ova pre-treatment contributed to the relief of colitis and decreased the mortality of the models. NOD2 expression was significantly downregulated when pretreated with the ova. The TNBS injection caused a significant downregulation of ZO-1 and occludin mRNA together with their proteins in the colon; ova pre-exposure reversed these alterations. Treatment with S. japonicum ova in the colitis model caused lower intestinal bacterial translocation frequency. CONCLUSION: S. japonicum ova can maintain epithelial barrier function through increasing tight junction proteins, thus causing less exposure of NOD2 to the luminal antigens which may activate a series of inflammatory factors and induce colitis. (C) 2011 Baishideng. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据