4.6 Article

Fresh frozen plasma transfusion does not affect outcomes following hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 16, 期 44, 页码 5603-5610

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i44.5603

关键词

Fresh frozen plasma; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Surgery; Transfusion

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22130005] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To investigate whether fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion affects outcomes following hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in terms of liver function, postoperative complications and cancer prognosis. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the incidence of postoperative complications between 204 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC with routine FFP transfusion in an early period (1983-1993, Group A) and 293 with necessity for FFP transfusion during a later period (1998-2006, Group B), and also between two subgroups of Group B [22 patients with FFP transfusion (Group B1) and 275 patients without FFP transfusion (Group B2)]. Additionally, only in limited patients in Group B1 and Group B2 with intraoperative blood loss >= 2000 mL (Group B1 >= 2000 mL and Group B2 >= 2000 mL), postoperative complications, liver function tests, and cancer prognosis were compared. RESULTS: No mortality was registered in Group B, compared to 8 patients (3.9%) of Group A. The incidence of morbidity in Group B2 [23.2% (64/275)] was not significantly different from Group B1 [40.9% (9/22)] and Group A [27.0% (55/204)]. The incidence of complications and postoperative liver function tests were comparable between Group B1 >= 2000 mL VS Group B2 >= 2000 mL. Postoperative prognosis did not correlate with administration of FFP, but with tumor-related factors. CONCLUSION: The outcome of hepatectomy for HCC is not influenced by FFP transfusion. We suggest FFP transfusion be abandoned in patients who undergo hepatectomy for HCC. (C) 2010 Baishideng. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据