4.6 Article

Sonography of the small intestine

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 15, 期 11, 页码 1319-1330

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.1319

关键词

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Crohn's disease; Endoscopic sonography; Endosonography; Enteroclysis; Hydrosonography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ultrasonography; Virtual endoscopy; Visualization

资金

  1. Haukeland University Hospital
  2. University in Bergen
  3. Christian Michelsen Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the last two decades, there has been substantial development in the diagnostic possibilities for examining the small intestine. Compared with computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, capsule endoscopy and double-balloon endoscopy, ultrasonography has the advantage of being cheap, portable, flexible and user- and patient-friendly, while at the same time providing the clinician with image data of high temporal and spatial resolution. The method has limitations with penetration in obesity and with intestinal air impairing image quality. The flexibility ultrasonography offers the examiner also implies that a systematic approach during scanning is needed. This paper reviews the basic scanning techniques and new modalities such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound, elastography, strain rate imaging, hydrosonography, allergosonography, endoscopic sonography and nutritional imaging, and the literature on disease-specific findings in the small intestine. Some of these methods have shown clinical benefit, while others are under research and development to establish their role in the diagnostic repertoire. However, along with improved overall image quality of new ultrasound scanners, these methods have enabled more anatomical and physiological changes in the small intestine to be observed. Accordingly, ultrasound of the small intestine is an attractive clinical tool to study patients with a range of diseases. (C) 2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据