4.2 Article

Mortality during US FDA clinical trials in patients with diabetes, hypertension, depression and schizophrenia

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 64-71

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15622975.2018.1514465

关键词

Mortality; depression; psychopharmacology; schizophrenia; clinical trials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between the mortality rates associated with psychiatric conditions like depression and schizophrenia compared with chronic medical conditions like hypertension and diabetes. Methods: Examined clinical trial safety data from New Drug Approval programmes reviewed by the US Food and Drug Administration and calculated all-cause and suicide/non-suicide mortality rates per 100,000 patient-exposure-years (PEY) for seven diabetes, 12 hypertension, 11 depression, and nine schizophrenia programmes (126,151 patients, 63,106.3 PEY). Results: Depression (894.8 +/- 201.2) and schizophrenia (935.3 +/- 214.6) had significantly higher all-cause mortality rates than diabetes (462.8 +/- 70.8) and hypertension (448.4 +/- 123.1). Psychiatric conditions had 1.9-2.1x the medical conditions' mortality (p < 0.001). Non-suicide mortality rates for depression (506.2 +/- 151.3), schizophrenia (550.9 +/- 164.7), diabetes (457.2 +/- 70.4) and hypertension (430.8 +/- 120.6) were comparable. Only antidiabetics showed a signal for all-cause mortality (reduction of 37%, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Depression and schizophrenia trial patients had comparable (if not higher) all-cause mortality rates as older populations in diabetes and hypertension trials, even when excluding suicides. While generalizability of the rates themselves is limited, this study can adequately estimate the relational mortality among these conditions because of the high internal consistency of clinical trials. Potential signals for mortality reduction with active treatment should be considered for all investigational medications for chronic conditions with increased mortality, including psychotropics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据