4.2 Article

Is attention to detail a similarly strong candidate endophenotype for anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa?

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 452-463

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/15622975.2011.639804

关键词

Anorexia; bulimia; neuropsychology; cognition; endophenotypes

资金

  1. Nina Jackson Research fellowship (REID)
  2. Psychiatry Research Trust [284286]
  3. Psychiatry Research Trust
  4. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, South London
  5. Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  6. Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. To investigate whether attention to detail is a similarly strong candidate endophenotype of anorexia (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN), and to explore the incidence and clinical correlates of attention to detail. Methods. A total of 266 women (including AN, BN, recovered AN, unaffected sisters of AN/BN & control women) undertook a thorough clinical assessment and were administered two neuropsychological measures of attention to detail (Group Embedded Figure Test; Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure). Results. Superior attention to detail was found across all AN groups including recovered AN and unaffected AN sisters. Those with BN and their unaffected sisters showed a profile more consistent with poor global integration. The combined effect of superior attention to detail and poor global integration (weak coherence) was present in 42.3% of active cases and corresponded with a more severe illness, elevated obsessive-compulsive symptoms, and a higher likelihood of comorbid clinical anxiety and self-harm. Conclusions. Attention to detail is a stronger candidate endophenotype of AN compared to BN, where poor global integration may be more relevant. The unique contribution of both aspects of weak coherence (superior attention to detail/poor global integration) requires further exploration and understanding in both eating disorders. Integrating cognitive remediation of these traits into treatment for the subset of patients it is relevant for may improve outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据