4.2 Article

Reduced negative BOLD responses in the default-mode network and increased self-focus in depression

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 627-637

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/15622975.2010.545145

关键词

Default-mode network; negative BOLD responses; major depression; self-related processing; event-related fMRI

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [DFG-SFB 779/A6]
  2. Swiss National Research Foundation [3100A0-100830]
  3. Research Foundation at the University of Zurich
  4. ETH Zurich (SEP)
  5. Philips Medical Systems, Best, NL
  6. Hartmann-Muller-Foundation
  7. Gebert-Ruf-Foundation
  8. Hope of Depression Research Foundation (HDRF/ISAN)
  9. CRC
  10. CIHR
  11. EJLB-Michael Smith Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. Functional imaging studies in major depressive disorder (MDD) indicate abnormal resting state neural activity and negative blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) responses (NBRs) in regions of the default-mode network (DMN). Methods. Since activity in DMN regions has been associated with self-relatedness, we investigated neural activity in these regions during self-related emotional judgement and passive picture viewing in 25 patients with MDD and 25 healthy controls in an event-related fMRI design. Results. Behaviourally, MDD subjects showed significantly higher ratings of self-relatedness that also correlated with depression symptoms such as hopelessness. Neuroimaging results in MDD patients showed significantly lower negative BOLD responses (NBRs) in anterior medial cortical regions during judgement of self-relatedness while posterior medial regions showed increased NBRs. Unlike in healthy subjects, the anterior medial cortical NBRs were no longer parametrically modulated by the degree of self-relatedness in MDD patients. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that reduced NBRs in the anterior regions of the default-mode network may signify decoupling from self-relatedness in MDD patients with the consecutive abnormal increase of self-focus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据