4.5 Article

Robust routing and channel allocation in multi-hop cognitive radio networks

期刊

WIRELESS NETWORKS
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 127-137

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-014-0776-0

关键词

Cognitive radio; Cognitive radio networks; Routing; Robustness; Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61072139, 61072106, 61001202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Jointly consider routing and spectrum selection is essentially and necessary in multi-hop cognitive radio networks. System cost and throughput are commonly used to evaluate performance of routing and spectrum selection schemes. Traditional methods mostly translate these metrics into a single objective function, and corresponding weights are allocated to each metric representing impact on the entire network performance. Optimal solutions of these approaches are sensitive to the weight settings which are usually hard to appropriately chosen. In this work, the task of routing and channel allocation is modeled as a two-objective optimization problem. Two conflicting metric functions system total throughput and total cost are optimized simultaneously, and a novel memetic algorithm which adopts a new neighborhood search procedure is proposed to solve this problem. Incorporated with robustness consideration on routing, a new robustness metric is also presented to work as a decision mechanism to ensure the robustness of the entire network. The aim of this task is to find the best compromise routing and channel allocation scheme on system throughput, cost and robustness among the feasible solution set. Simulation results demonstrate that the optimal solution set obtained by the memetic algorithm can clearly show the conflicting relationship of the system cost and throughput when choosing different routing and channel selection schemes. The best solution made by the additional robustness metric among these solutions can achieve the best performance of the cognitive radio network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据