4.3 Article

Nest caging as a conservation tool for threatened songbirds

期刊

WILDLIFE RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 7, 页码 598-605

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/WR14136

关键词

corvid; enclosure; Epthianura albifrons; nest predation; predator exclusion; saltmarsh

资金

  1. Lake Macquarie City Council
  2. Herman Slade Foundation
  3. Foundation for National Parks and Wildlife

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context Enclosing nests in cages to exclude predators is a management tool frequently used to increase the reproductive success of threatened ground-nesting precocial birds. This technique has seldom been used with passerines, despite the predicted increased benefit for altricial species due to their longer period of nest dependency. Aims The aims of this study were to determine (1) whether cages could be installed around the nests of a threatened, shrub-nesting passerine without causing parental desertion, and (2) whether caged nests could successfully exclude the dominant nest predators and increase nesting success. Methods Cages with four different mesh sizes (1000mm, 200mm, 100mm, 50mm) were installed sequentially in trials at four nests in a secure population and three nests in an endangered population of white-fronted chats (Epthianura albifrons) to investigate susceptibility to desertion. Trials using 160 caged and uncaged artificial nests were used to determine the efficacy of 50-mm wire mesh in preventing access to eggs by potential nest predators. Key results Parent birds accepted nest cages, which reduced predation rates on artificial nests from 96% to 14%. Infrared-triggered cameras revealed that corvids were responsible for 94% of predation episodes. Nest success of caged white-fronted chat nests was 85% (n=7). Conclusions Nest cages do not appear to have negative effects on nest success of white-fronted chats, and may considerably increase reproductive success. Implications Nest cages may aid conservation of the endangered population of white-fronted chats and other endangered songbird species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据