4.1 Article

Clinical characteristics of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Austria - is there a need for a structured screening program?

期刊

WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT
卷 123, 期 17-18, 页码 542-551

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00508-011-0033-9

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; clinical characteristics; diagnosis; screening; epidemiology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: We investigated the differences in clinical presentation of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at the time of diagnosis, before and after the publication of the European Association for the study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines of HCC management and screening. Methods: Between 1991 and 2009, 907 patients were diagnosed with HCC at our department of which 850 were included in this study. Data regarding demography, liver function and tumor stage at the time of diagnosis were retrospectively collected. Differences in clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) were compared before (period 1) and after (period 2) the publication of the EASL guidelines in 2001. Results: In period 2, patients were more likely to be overweight (BMI: 26.1 vs. 27.5, p = 0.003), suffered more often from diabetes (25.4 vs. 37.3%, p = 0.001) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (0.7 vs. 5.1%, p < 0.001). Alcoholic liver disease replaced viral hepatitis as the main etiology but not in the increasing number of patients with migration background where viral hepatitis (76.3%) remained the predominant etiology. No change in liver function and tumor stages at the time of HCC diagnosis was observed. Most patients presented with advanced incurable HCC. However, the median OS of all HCC patients increased in period 2 (7 vs. 14 months, p < 0.001) suggesting improvements of palliative therapy. Conclusions: Patients with HCC are still predominantly diagnosed at incurable tumor stages, despite explicit European screening guidelines existing since 9 years. The implementation of a HCC surveillance program for cirrhotic patients in Austria seems to be warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据