4.1 Article

Decomposition and nitrogen dynamics of Rhynchospora asperula in floating soils of Esteros del Ibera, Argentina

期刊

WETLANDS ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 191-201

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11273-009-9159-1

关键词

Decomposition; Floating soils; Nitrogen; Macrophytes

资金

  1. ERB [IC18-CT98-0262]
  2. Universidad Nacional del Lujan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In floating soils, organic matter accumulation is the result of the imbalance between decomposition rate and macrophytes' production, and it can limit nutrient availability. In this study, we determined the percentage of litter that is added to the floating soil in one year and the nitrogen dynamics of Rhynchospora asperula (Nees) Steud (Cyperaceae), an abundant species in Esteros del Ibera, a South American wetland with extended areas of floating soils. According to the decomposition rate determined (k = 0.0032 day(-1)), the annual percentage of mass lost was 69%. Conditions of the floating soil were simulated in a 146-day field experiment. The results show that the decomposition rate was higher when the litter was in water contact, and the mass loss in the field sampling at the beginning of the decomposition was similar to that of the treatments that simulated this condition. The nitrogen concentration in the aboveground biomass was almost constant, and the results indicate that there was translocation from the senescent leaves, but not a preferential nitrogen translocation from the rhizomes and roots. During summer the maximum biomass and the low nitrogen concentration in the floating soil coincide, but the nitrogen intake by the aboveground biomass was only 4% of the total nitrogen content of the floating soil. Nitrogen concentration in the litter increased and, though immobilization cannot be ruled out, there was net mineralization. The nitrogen mineralized in the first decomposition year was 30% of the nitrogen added to aboveground biomass during the study period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据