4.2 Article

Impact of climate and land use type on the distribution of Finnish casual arable weeds in Europe

期刊

WEED RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 201-208

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00826.x

关键词

alien plants; agriculture; biological invasions; climate change; C-4 species; GLMM

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [122477]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [122477, 122477] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the study was to explore the impact of climate and land use type on species richness and abundance of arable weeds found as casual aliens in Finland. We used an empirical data set collected along a European climate gradient, from which 163 plants were selected for the analyses. Using generalised linear modelling (GLMM) and redundancy analysis (RDA), we compared species richness and abundance of all species and three functional groups (dicotyledons and grasses, C-3 and C-4 species, alien and native species to Europe), as well as occurrence of the 13 most common individual species between three land use types (fallow, low-input and conventionally cultivated) and six regions. In general, fallowing and low-input cultivation, as well as warmer climate, supported greater weed species richness and abundance. Temperature was found to be a more important factor for weed abundance than land use. The only exception was C-4 species richness, which did not respond to either factor. The impact of land use was independent of climate for all variables, except C-4 species abundance. Non-cultivated fallows had more weeds than cultivated fields, in most cases. No difference was found in the species richness and abundance of grasses or in the occurrence of individual species between low-input and conventionally cultivated fields. It was evident that climate and land use affect the distribution of arable weed species currently found as casual aliens in Finland. This suggests that climate warming will increase the risk of the population establishment of new weed species in northern regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据