4.2 Article

Utilizing Normalized Anomalies to Assess Synoptic-Scale Weather Events in the Western United States

期刊

WEATHER AND FORECASTING
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 428-445

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2009WAF2222273.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Weather Service, Salt Lake City

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synoptic-scale weather events over the western United States are objectively ranked based on their associated tropospheric anomalies Data from the NCEP 6-h reanalysis fields from 1948 to 2006 are compared to a 30-yr (1971-2000) reanalysis climatology The relative rants' of an event is measured by the number of standard deviations that the 1000-200-hPa height. temperature. wind, and moisture fields depart from climatology The top 20 synoptic-scale events were identified over the western United States, adjacent eastern Pacific Ocean. Mexico, and Canada Events that composed the top 20 tended to he very anomalous in several. if not all four, of the atmospheric variables The events included the northern Intermountain West region heavy rainfall and Yellowstone tornado of mid-July 1987 (ranked 5th), the Montana floods of September 1986 (ranked 4th) and the historic 1962 Columbus Day windstorm in the Pacific Northwest (ranked 10th) In addition, the top 10 most anomalous events were identified for each month and for each of the variables investigated revealing additional significant weather events Finally, anomaly return periods were computed for each variable at a variety of levels To place a given anomaly in perspective for a specific level or element, forecasters need Information on the frequency with which that anomaly is observed These return periods can he utilized by forecasters to compare forecast anomalies to the actual occurrence of similar anomalies for the element and level of interest to gauge the potential significance of the event It is believed that this approach may allow forecasters to better understand the historical significance of an event and provide additional in to the user community

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据